Language: Malayalam
Age Rating: U/A
Genre: Suspense, Legal Drama, Social Commentary
Released In Theatres: July 17, 2025

In this Janaki V vs State of Kerala movie review, we explore a socially driven courtroom suspense thriller that bravely confronts real-life issues surrounding justice, gender violence, and digital-age harassment. Written and directed by Pravin Narayanan, the film delivers strong performances—especially by Anupama Parameshwaran—but is weighed down by uneven storytelling and an overstretched narrative structure.

Plot: Justice on Trial in a Fragmented System

Set in the backdrop of Kerala and Bengaluru, the film follows the journey of Janaki V (Anupama Parameshwaran), an IT professional whose life takes a dark turn when she’s assaulted during a visit to her hometown. What begins as a crime soon becomes a layered exploration of the justice system, personal trauma, and the legal maze faced by survivors.

Stepping into the courtroom is Advocate David Abel Donovan (Suresh Gopi), a high-profile lawyer defending the accused. The film unravels not only what happened to Janaki but why the system often fails to serve justice swiftly or sensitively.

Performances: A Cast That Carries the Emotional Weight

Anupama Parameshwaran as Janaki V

In what might be her most emotionally demanding role yet, Anupama Parameshwaran shines as the titular Janaki. With remarkable restraint and depth, she portrays a woman enduring unimaginable trauma, while fighting against the social and legal hurdles that follow. Her performance is layered with vulnerability, quiet rage, and strength—making her the emotional anchor of the film.

Suresh Gopi as Advocate David Abel Donovan

Returning to the silver screen post his political stint, Suresh Gopi brings intensity and theatrical flair to the courtroom. While his portrayal sometimes feels dramatically heightened in contrast to the grounded tone of the rest of the film, he commands presence in every scene. His character adds complexity to the moral dilemma the film tries to dissect.

Supporting Cast

The supporting characters—from Janaki’s family and friends to legal professionals and investigators—each add essential nuance to the narrative. Their grounded performances help reflect the varied responses and biases that exist in society toward survivors of violence. Special mention goes to the actors portraying Janaki’s mother and colleagues, who subtly amplify the emotional and societal pressure Janaki faces.

Direction and Screenplay: Thoughtful Themes, Uneven Structure

Director Pravin Narayanan brings forward a story that is not only relevant but essential in today’s sociopolitical climate. The themes—ranging from cyber harassment to survivor silencing—are explored with sincerity. However, the screenplay struggles to maintain narrative focus. Several subplots, while engaging in isolation, are dropped abruptly, making the pacing and thematic development feel disjointed.

What begins as a legal thriller occasionally strays into emotional melodrama, only to return with courtroom intensity. A tighter edit and clearer thematic structure could have helped the film maintain its momentum and emotional grip.

Visuals and Music: Traditional Choices with Missed Potential

Visually, the film sticks to a safe and conventional aesthetic. The courtroom and domestic scenes are effectively shot, but the cinematography misses opportunities to innovate or amplify the emotional stakes. Similarly, the music score supports the narrative without distracting but lacks a distinctive identity.

Editing, by Samjith Mohammed, could have benefited from sharper cuts, especially in scenes where tension or emotional transitions are diluted by overly long shots.

Strengths and Shortcomings

What Works:
✔️ Anupama Parameshwaran’s deeply affecting lead performance
✔️ Suresh Gopi’s high-impact screen presence
✔️ A socially relevant and timely subject
✔️ The film’s courage to initiate uncomfortable conversations

Where It Stumbles:
➖ Inconsistent screenplay pacing
➖ Overuse of misdirected subplots
➖ Uneven tonal shifts between realism and theatrics
➖ Lack of visual or musical distinction

Cultural Relevance and Impact

Janaki V vs State of Kerala boldly tackles systemic issues faced by women navigating both personal trauma and institutional apathy. Its inclusion of layered topics—cybercrime, consent, social stigma, and abortion—makes it more than a legal drama. It becomes a cinematic discussion. While the message is slightly undercut by inconsistent storytelling, the intention and subject matter remain impactful.

Final Verdict: ⭐️⭐️⭐️ (3.5/5 Stars)

Despite its uneven execution, Janaki V vs State of Kerala is an important film that speaks to real issues with sincerity. Anchored by a compelling performance from Anupama Parameshwaran and backed by a cast that gives weight to the narrative, the film succeeds in sparking dialogue. With a more refined screenplay and balanced tone, it could have been truly exceptional—but as it stands, it remains a bold step forward for Malayalam cinema.

Should You Watch It?
Yes—if you value films that reflect society’s uncomfortable truths and appreciate emotionally grounded performances, this is one courtroom drama that deserves your attention.

Janaki V vs State of Kerala Movie Review: A Gritty Yet Flawed Courtroom Drama With Powerful Intentions

Mr Reddy Movie Review: A Heartfelt and Inspiring Tale of Struggles, Love & Redemption

Jenma Natchathiram Movie Review: A Bold but Uneven Attempt at Genre-Bending Horror

Sant Tukaram Movie Review: A Profoundly Inspiring Retelling of a Spiritual Icon’s Journey