The Delhi High Court expressed strong disapproval of a contemnor’s threats during virtual proceedings in a criminal contempt case. Despite being directed to appear physically, respondent Adeeshwar Singhal chose to participate via video conferencing. The court warned that such behavior could lead to “compounding of the contempt.”
The Bench, led by Justices Navin Chawla and Ravinder Dudeja, noted the respondent’s failure to comply with the directive for physical presence. While attending virtually, Singhal’s conduct was deemed unacceptable, including threats made towards the Court. The court emphasized that such actions would not be tolerated and could result in serious consequences.
Strict adherence to previous orders was emphasized by the court, which instructed Singhal to appear in person at the next hearing. Non-compliance would lead to coercive measures being taken. Senior advocate Dr. Amit George was appointed as amicus curiae to assist in the case, and the proceedings were directed to be recorded and preserved for future reference.
The next hearing in this contempt case is scheduled for March 23, 2026. The proceedings originated from a district court judge’s reference in April 2025, alleging scandalous remarks by Singhal against a judicial officer during virtual sessions. Despite warnings, Singhal disrupted the hearings, leading to the initiation of contempt proceedings against him.
