Close Menu
  • Indian Festivals 2026
  • Movie & OTT Releases This Week
  • Entertainment
  • NRI Life
  • Research
  • Advertise with us
Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram YouTube
  • Download Indian Community App
  • Advertise Here
Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
Indian CommunityIndian Community
Trending
  • The Indian Head Wobble, Explained: What It Actually Means (And Why Almost No One Gets It Right)
  • Mirzapur The Movie Review 2026: Explosive Bhaukaal Saga Delivers Nostalgic Thrills
  • Romanchakam Movie Review 2026: A Delightful Youthful Romance That Wins Hearts
  • Immortal Movie Review 2026: A Bold Bat-Fantasy Horror That Bites Into New Territory
  • Yen Ennai Edho Seidhai Movie Review 2026: A Heartfelt Slice-of-Life Triumph Worth Watching
  • Jeevan Ya Bheema Con Review 2026: A Wildly Entertaining Mistaken-Identity Caper That Delivers Big Laughs
  • Mahaprabhu Jagannath Movie Review 2026: A Divine Animated Triumph Families Will Love
  • Gandhari Movie Review 2026: Taapsee Pannu Delivers a Gripping, Unmissable Thriller
  • Indian Festivals 2026
  • Entertainment
  • Latest Movie Releases
    • Latest OTT Releases
  • NRI Life
  • India & Culture
  • Health & Wellness
  • Research
Indian CommunityIndian Community
Home » News » National
National

Delhi High Court Grants Sonia Gandhi and Rahul Gandhi Three Weeks to Respond in National Herald Money Laundering Case

Indian Community Editorial TeamBy Indian Community Editorial TeamJuly 27, 20261 Min ReadNo Comments Add us to Google Preferred Sources
Delhi High Court Grants Sonia Gandhi and Rahul Gandhi Three Weeks to Respond in National Herald Money Laundering Case
Share
Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Pinterest Email

The Delhi High Court has given Sonia Gandhi, Rahul Gandhi, and others three weeks to respond to the Enforcement Directorate’s criminal revision petition regarding the National Herald money laundering case. The court set the next hearing for September 10. The ED has named Sonia Gandhi, Rahul Gandhi, Sam Pitroda, and others as proposed accused in the case.

The ED is challenging a court order from December 16, 2025, which rejected its prosecution complaint under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act. It argues that the trial court’s decision was legally incorrect. The ED believes that a prosecution complaint under the PMLA can be based on a scheduled offense arising from a private complaint.

The ED asserts that the cognizance taken by a competent court on a private complaint holds more weight than an FIR filed by the police. It emphasizes that criminal proceedings can be initiated through a police investigation or a private complaint before a Magistrate. The Solicitor General representing the ED had argued that the PMLA would become redundant if the trial court’s interpretation is upheld.

Delhi High Court Enforcement Directorate National Herald Prevention of Money Laundering Act Rahul Gandhi Sam Pitroda Sonia Gandhi Young Indian
Add us to Google Preferred Sources
Indian Community Editorial Team

The Indian Community Editorial Team curates, verifies, and publishes stories that matter to Indians worldwide. From culture and community to business and innovation, our mission is to spotlight voices, ideas, and events that bring our global community closer together. Have news or a story to share? Submit it to us at [email protected].

Add A Comment

Piyush Soni: The Chokra Singer’s Journey Back to Music

August 24, 2026

Formula 1: Max Verstappen pens contract extension with Red Bull till 2030

August 20, 2026

Prakash Raj to play revered carnatic music maestro in ‘Jagamae Sangeetham’

August 20, 2026

Three in four occupiers plan to expand their office portfolios in India over next two years

August 20, 2026
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Pinterest
  • Instagram
About Us
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Terms of Service
Corporate
  • Download Indian Community App
  • Advertise Here
Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Terms of Service
© 2026 Designed by CreativeMerchants.

Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.