Close Menu
  • Indian Festivals 2026
  • Movie & OTT Releases This Week
  • News
  • Entertainment
  • NRI Life
  • Research
  • Advertise with us
Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram YouTube
  • Download Indian Community App
  • Advertise Here
Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
Indian CommunityIndian Community
Trending
  • Mathe Male Hoyyuthide Review: A Heartfelt Generational Love Story Set in the Rains of Malenadu
  • M4M – Motive for Murder Review: A Gripping Telugu Crime Thriller That Turns Murders into Masterpieces
  • Ankam Attahasam Movie Review (2026): Madhav Suresh’s Gritty Trivandrum Gangster Drama Is a Raw, Riveting Ride
  • Citadel Season 2 Review (2026): Priyanka Chopra, Richard Madden & Stanley Tucci Make This Prime Video Thriller Unmissable
  • Dridam Movie Review: Shane Nigam’s Slow-Burn Cop Drama Is Gripping — Until It Isn’t
  • 29 Movie Review: A Heartfelt Romantic Drama That Blooms in Its Own Time
  • Razor Movie Review (2026): Ravi Babu Delivers a Gripping Survival Thriller
  • Sathi Leelavathi Review (2026): Lavanya Tripathi Shines in This Heartfelt Family Entertainer
  • Indian Festivals 2026
  • News
    • National
    • International
    • Entertainment
    • Achievements
    • Scam Alerts
    • Business
    • Health & Medicine
    • Science & Technology
    • Sports
  • Entertainment
  • Latest Movie Releases
    • Latest OTT Releases
  • NRI Life
  • India & Culture
  • Health & Wellness
  • Research
Indian CommunityIndian Community
Home » News » National
National

Madras High Court Allows Advocate’s Motion to Restrain Release of Book Portraying Judge as RSS Sympathizer

Indian Community Editorial TeamBy Indian Community Editorial TeamJanuary 7, 20262 Mins ReadNo Comments Add us to Google Preferred Sources
Madras High Court Allows Advocate’s Motion to Restrain Release of Book Portraying Judge as RSS Sympathizer
Share
Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Pinterest Email

The Madras High Court granted permission for an advocate to file a motion to prevent the release of a Tamil book that allegedly depicts Justice G. R. Swaminathan as a sympathizer of the Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh (RSS) due to his ruling in the Thirupparankundram Karthigai Deepam case. The First Division Bench, led by Chief Justice Manindra Mohan Shrivastava and Justice G. Arul Murugan, agreed to urgently address the matter as requested by advocate B. Jagannath. The advocate raised concerns over the book’s impending release in Chennai, prompting swift judicial action.

The Bench acknowledged the gravity of the situation and summoned Advocate General P.S. Raman and Additional Solicitor General AR.L. Sundaresan for a further hearing during the afternoon session. It was highlighted that the issue involved personal attacks on a sitting judge for decisions made in the course of his judicial responsibilities. The Advocate General expressed reservations about directly involving himself in the case, citing potential implications of criminal contempt of court under the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971.

During the proceedings, the Advocate General indicated that he might not be the appropriate authority to directly engage in the matter and mentioned the role of the Advocate General as the statutory figure for authorizing contempt proceedings. He informed the court of his intention to delegate representation to one of the Additional Advocates General for the State’s participation in the afternoon hearing. In response, the Bench instructed advocate Jagannath to inform the Additional Solicitor General to ensure his presence at the hearing.

Advocate Jagannath presented a pamphlet to the court during the discussion, which was reportedly widely circulated on social media. The pamphlet featured the book’s cover image portraying Justice Swaminathan in a controversial manner, dressed in khaki half-trousers, holding a saffron flag and a lamp (deepam). The book’s Tamil title questioned Justice Swaminathan’s judicial integrity, labeling him as “a judge or an RSS rowdy” and announced its availability at the Chennai Book Fair 2026 for Rs 30. The advocate argued against the personal vilification of the judge concerning his December 1, 2025, ruling on the Thirupparankundram Karthigai Deepam issue, urging the court to prevent such attacks on the judiciary.

Following the advocate’s submission, the Chief Justice instructed him to formally file a petition promptly, scheduling the matter for a later hearing on the same day.

1971 Additional Solicitor General AR.L. Sundaresan Advocate General P.S. Raman Chennai Book Fair 2026 Chief Justice Manindra Mohan Shrivastava Contempt of Courts Act Justice G.R. Swaminathan Madras High Court Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh (RSS) Thirupparankundram Karthigai Deepam case
Add us to Google Preferred Sources
Indian Community Editorial Team

The Indian Community Editorial Team curates, verifies, and publishes stories that matter to Indians worldwide. From culture and community to business and innovation, our mission is to spotlight voices, ideas, and events that bring our global community closer together. Have news or a story to share? Submit it to us at [email protected].

Add A Comment

Jewellery Company Shares Drop as PM Modi Urges Delay in Gold Purchases

May 11, 2026

South Korea’s Opposition Criticizes Government Over Strait of Hormuz Vessel Attack

May 11, 2026

US Military Flights Increase Near Cuba Coast

May 11, 2026

South Korean Naval Destroyer to Join Fleet Review and Field Exercise in the US

May 11, 2026
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Pinterest
  • Instagram
About Us
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Terms of Service
Corporate
  • Download Indian Community App
  • Advertise Here
Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Terms of Service
© 2026 Designed by CreativeMerchants.

Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.