The Supreme Court ruled that a municipal authority cannot be held liable under the Motor Vehicles Act for injuries caused by a tree branch falling on a stationary autorickshaw during heavy rain. However, invoking its powers under Article 142 of the Constitution, the Court increased the compensation for the injured claimant from Rs 17.10 lakh to Rs 25 lakh. The case stemmed from an incident in 2007 when a branch fell on an autorickshaw in Bengaluru, injuring a passenger.
Examining the concept of “Act of God” and the responsibilities of public authorities, the Court emphasized that municipal corporations must maintain roadside trees and ensure regular upkeep. While acknowledging the duty of civic authorities to care for trees, the Court also cautioned against setting unrealistic standards for them. The Court clarified that the incident did not have a sufficient causal connection with the autorickshaw to warrant a claim under the Motor Vehicles Act.
Despite ruling in favor of the municipal corporation regarding liability, the Court expressed concern for the severe condition of the injured claimant, who suffered life-altering injuries. The Court found the compensation awarded by the Karnataka High Court inadequate and enhanced it to Rs 25 lakh, emphasizing the need for a humane approach in such cases. The Court directed all parties involved to deposit the compensation amount within four weeks, maintaining the existing apportionment of liability.
