The Supreme Court has upheld its previous directives on managing stray dogs in public areas, alongside issuing new guidelines to ensure more rigorous enforcement of the Animal Birth Control (ABC) framework nationwide. The Court, led by Justices Vikram Nath, Sandeep Mehta, and N.V. Anjaria, rejected pleas from dog enthusiasts and animal rights organizations seeking changes to the November directives. It emphasized that stray dogs captured from sensitive locations like schools and hospitals should not be released back after sterilization and vaccination.
The Bench highlighted that the “right to life with dignity” encompasses living without the fear of dog attacks in public spaces. It criticized authorities for inadequately addressing the increasing issue of stray dog bites, citing reports that indicate a significant problem with the existing rules and regulations. The Court cautioned that officials failing to adhere to its orders could face contempt of court and disciplinary measures.
In a comprehensive move, the Supreme Court instructed all states and union territories to enhance infrastructure under the ABC Rules within specific timelines. It mandated the establishment of fully equipped ABC centers in every district, complete with surgical facilities, trained staff, and logistical support. Additionally, authorities were directed to scale up these centers based on population density, conduct staff training, fortify shelters, and organize vaccination campaigns.
The Court permitted authorities to take lawful actions, including euthanasia, in cases involving rabid or incurably ill dogs to mitigate risks to human life effectively. It also tasked the National Highways Authority of India to collaborate with states in developing a comprehensive strategy to manage stray animals on national highways. The Court further advised considering extending these guidelines to other crowded public areas after assessing risks to public safety.
