The proposed 28th constitutional amendment in Pakistan is sparking discussions about potential changes that could centralize power at the federal level, reshaping authority within the federation. Concerns have been raised that this amendment might weaken provincial autonomy and shift the balance between elected institutions and unelected power centers.
Experts suggest that the amendment could be part of a broader effort to restructure the state towards centralized control, manageable political competition, and a diminished provincial voice. The move is seen as an attempt by the Pakistani establishment to regain leverage over a federation that was decentralized by the 18th Amendment, particularly in sectors like health, administration, and education.
One of the key motivations behind the proposed amendment is to create a constitutional framework that is easier to manage from the center, especially in the face of political uncertainties, coalition fragility, and provincial assertiveness. This potential shift has raised concerns about the impact on provincial trust and democratic accountability, with fears that it could lead to slower service delivery and greater distance between authorities and the public.
The Human Rights Commission of Pakistan (HRCP) recently expressed alarm over shrinking civic space, erosion of judicial independence, and growing insecurity in the country. The HRCP’s report highlighted restrictions on freedom of expression, increased targeting of journalists and activists, and a climate of fear and self-censorship. Amendments to laws allowing arbitrary detention without judicial oversight and concerns about judicial independence have also been noted.
