The Supreme Court expressed concern over the increasing practice of political parties and state governments offering “freebies” before elections. The Court, led by Chief Justice of India Surya Kant, questioned the indiscriminate distribution of welfare benefits, warning about its negative impact on the country’s long-term economic growth. It raised issues regarding states absorbing electricity bills and providing blanket subsidies without considering the financial status of the recipients.
The bench emphasized the need to differentiate between those who can afford to pay for services and those who genuinely require assistance. It questioned the wisdom of offering benefits without such distinctions, raising concerns about the implications of such policies. The Court highlighted the importance of prioritizing development expenditure, even in revenue-surplus states, suggesting a focus on infrastructure like roads, hospitals, and schools over election-driven welfare schemes.
The Supreme Court expressed distress over the timing of welfare scheme announcements close to elections, urging a reevaluation by political leaders and parties. It emphasized the significance of creating employment opportunities to ensure people can earn with dignity and self-respect. The Court underscored the government’s responsibility to provide genuine welfare measures to those in need, while cautioning against the proliferation of unconditional benefits that could discourage work ethic.
