The Delhi High Court has approved a four-week parole for a convict under the POCSO Act to file an SLP before the Supreme Court. This decision allows the prisoner to seek legal assistance beyond jail services. The court emphasized that denying parole based solely on the nature of the conviction is unjust.
The court overturned the rejection of Faizan Ahmad’s parole plea, highlighting the importance of effective legal representation. It stressed that prisoners should have the right to choose private counsel over jail advocates. The ruling emphasized the need for a conducive environment for legal discussions, which jail visitors’ rooms may not provide.
Justice Kathpalia emphasized the prisoner’s right to pursue legal remedies effectively. The court directed the convict’s release on parole upon meeting specified conditions. It also prohibited any contact with prosecution witnesses during the parole period. Additionally, the convict must provide necessary details to the authorities and surrender the SLP copy upon return to jail.
The court’s decision ensures that the convict can present his case before the Supreme Court without hindrance. It underscores the importance of safeguarding a prisoner’s right to legal representation, even in cases involving serious offenses. The ruling sets a precedent for granting parole to enable effective legal recourse for prisoners.
