Close Menu
  • Indian Festivals 2026
  • Movie & OTT Releases This Week
  • News
  • Entertainment
  • NRI Life
  • Research
  • Advertise with us
Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram YouTube
  • Download Indian Community App
  • Advertise Here
Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
Indian CommunityIndian Community
Trending
  • Jetlee (2026) Review: Satya Steals the Sky in This Turbulent But Fun Telugu Action-Comedy
  • Glory (2026) Review: A Riveting Sports Drama That Packs a Powerful Punch
  • Undekhi Season 4 Review: Darker, Deeper, and More Gripping Than Ever
  • Sapne Vs Everyone Season 2 Review: A Raw, Riveting Tale of Dreams, Ambition & Survival
  • KD: The Devil 2026 Review: Dhruva Sarja’s Underworld Epic Is a Bold, Ambitious Saga
  • Patriot (2026) Movie Review: Mammootty and Mohanlal’s Legendary Reunion Delivers a Gripping Surveillance Thriller
  • Kara Movie Review: Dhanush Delivers a Gripping Slow-Burn Thriller You Cannot Miss
  • Raja Shivaji (2026) Movie Review: Riteish Deshmukh’s Grand Epic Is a Majestic Tribute to the Warrior King
  • Indian Festivals 2026
  • News
    • National
    • International
    • Entertainment
    • Achievements
    • Scam Alerts
    • Business
    • Health & Medicine
    • Science & Technology
    • Sports
  • Entertainment
  • Latest Movie Releases
    • Latest OTT Releases
  • NRI Life
  • India & Culture
  • Health & Wellness
  • Research
Indian CommunityIndian Community
Home » News » National
National

SC to hear pleas seeking restoration of J&K statehood on Thursday

Indian Community Editorial TeamBy Indian Community Editorial TeamAugust 13, 20252 Mins ReadNo Comments Add us to Google Preferred Sources
SC to hear pleas seeking restoration of J&K statehood on Thursday
Share
Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Pinterest Email

New Delhi, Aug 14 (IANS) The Supreme Court is slated to hear on Thursday a clutch of applications seeking restoration of statehood to Jammu and Kashmir in a time-bound manner.

As per the causelist published on the website of the apex court, a Bench of CJI BR Gavai and K Vinod Chandran will take up the matter for hearing on August 14 — a day before Independence Day.

Last week, CJI Gavai agreed to retain the pleas for hearing on board after it was mentioned by senior advocate Gopal Sankaranarayanan.

One of the miscellaneous applications, filed by Zahoor Ahmed Bhat and activist Khurshaid Ahmad Malik, contended that the continued delay in restoring statehood is “gravely affecting the rights of the citizens of Jammu and Kashmir and also violating the idea of federalism”.

The applicants argued that the failure to restore statehood within a time-bound framework amounts to a violation of federalism, which forms part of the Basic Structure of the Constitution.

In ‘re: Article 370 of the Constitution’ verdict, a 5-judge Constitution Bench, headed by then CJI D.Y. Chandrachud, had left open the question of whether the Parliament can extinguish the character of statehood by converting a state into one or more Union Territories, relying on the statement made by Solicitor General Tushar Mehta that statehood would be restored to Jammu and Kashmir.

In the course of the oral hearing, SG Mehta, the second-highest law officer of the Centre, had submitted that the Union Home Ministry cannot give any exact timeframe and it would take “some time” for the restoration of statehood in Jammu and Kashmir.

However, the Constitution Bench, also comprising Justices S.K. Kaul, Sanjiv Khanna, Gavai and Surya Kant, had ordered the Election Commission of India (ECI) to take steps to conduct elections to the Legislative Assembly of Jammu and Kashmir, constituted under Section 14 of the Reorganisation Act, by September 30, 2024, and said that “restoration of statehood shall take place at the earliest and as soon as possible”.

It had upheld the status of Ladakh as a Union Territory under Article 3(a) read with Explanation I of the Constitution, which permits the formation of a Union Territory by separating a territory from any state. In May 2024, the Supreme Court dismissed review petitions challenging its verdict, stating there was “no error apparent on the face of the record” and refused to list the matter in open court.

–IANS

pds/vd

Add us to Google Preferred Sources
Indian Community Editorial Team

The Indian Community Editorial Team curates, verifies, and publishes stories that matter to Indians worldwide. From culture and community to business and innovation, our mission is to spotlight voices, ideas, and events that bring our global community closer together. Have news or a story to share? Submit it to us at [email protected].

Add A Comment

Karnataka Government Partners with ISEG to Develop Economic Master Plan for Bengaluru

May 5, 2026

Hyderabad to Implement Safety Measures on Outer Ring Road to Reduce Accidents

May 5, 2026

Gujarat Government to Release Water from Lakhanka Dam to Alleviate Scarcity

May 5, 2026

Renowned South Indian Film Producer R.B. Chaudhary Dies in Road Accident

May 5, 2026
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Pinterest
  • Instagram
About Us
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Terms of Service
Corporate
  • Download Indian Community App
  • Advertise Here
Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Terms of Service
© 2026 Designed by CreativeMerchants.

Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.