The Supreme Court has reserved its order on a public interest litigation (PIL) that seeks to end the current practice of carrying out death sentences by hanging. During the hearing, various parties presented arguments, including a Law Commission of India report proposing less painful methods of execution. Suggestions for alternatives like lethal injection were discussed, with concerns raised about complications and failed executions in other jurisdictions. The Court directed all parties to submit their brief notes and written submissions within three weeks.
The PIL challenges the use of hanging for executions, citing prolonged pain and questioning its compatibility with evolving human dignity standards under Article 21 of the Constitution. The Court had previously questioned the government’s reluctance to consider lethal injection, emphasizing the need to adapt to changing times. The petitioner argues that hanging causes prolonged suffering compared to quicker and less painful methods like lethal injection or shooting, which lead to death within minutes.
Attorney General R. Venkataramani informed the Court that the Union government is examining the issue at a high level, with committees already looking into possible alternatives. The Court clarified that the government could return with further examination results if needed. The final decision on the matter is pending as the Court evaluates the arguments and submissions made by all concerned parties.
