The Supreme Court emphasized that interim orders from High Courts should not remain in effect indefinitely. A recent case challenged a status quo order by the Allahabad High Court, highlighting the need for prompt handling of applications seeking to vacate such orders. The apex court stressed the importance of Article 226(3) of the Constitution in ensuring a fair balance between interim relief and procedural justice.
The Bench, led by Justices Aravind Kumar and Prasanna B. Varale, noted the delay in addressing an application to lift the interim status quo order. Referring to Article 226(3), the court underscored the requirement for High Courts to resolve such applications within two weeks. This provision aims to prevent the misuse of interim orders and safeguard the rights of all parties involved.
Article 226(3) mandates that High Courts dispose of applications to vacate interim orders promptly, especially when passed without hearing the opposing party. By enforcing this provision, the courts aim to prevent undue prejudice and ensure fairness in legal proceedings. The Supreme Court’s recent order urged the Allahabad High Court to expedite the resolution of the pending application, emphasizing the need for timely action in such matters.
