The CPI(M) in Kerala is under scrutiny for its frequent use of the term “class traitor,” especially as recent defections reveal alleged inconsistencies in its political stance. Party leaders and members have labeled veteran figures like V. Kunjikrishnan and T.K. Govindan as such, following their departure from the party after decades of loyalty, citing sustained injustice and neglect. The defections have sparked ideological debates and public displays of discontent, with former leaders facing accusations of betraying their class politics.
The trend continued with G. Sudhakaran, a former State Minister, deciding to run as an Independent candidate, supported by the Congress party, and legislators S. Rajendran and Aiysha Potti switching to the BJP and Congress, respectively. These moves have heightened political tensions in an already dynamic election season. Critics are now questioning the CPI(M)’s selective application of ideological rhetoric, noting a contrasting approach when welcoming leaders from rival camps, particularly the Congress-led UDF.
While outgoing members are swiftly branded as “class traitors,” the party’s tone shifts when incorporating leaders from opposing factions, portraying them as advocates of progressive politics. This inconsistency is exemplified by the party’s history of embracing former Congress figures like K.P. Anil Kumar and Dr. Sarin, who were promptly fielded as candidates after joining the CPI(M). Recent reports even suggest the potential candidacy of Abdurehman Randathani, a senior leader from the Indian Union Muslim League, by the CPI(M) in Malappuram. As Kerala gears up for crucial elections, the CPI(M)’s differing responses to defections raise questions about ideological integrity versus electoral strategies.
